Book Reviews Are a Doubled-Edged Sword

Creators seek reviews of their novel with the goal of:

assisting readers to make informed choices about their reading selections
increasing their visibility in the book market
increasing their book sales record
developing their reputation as an established writer
improving their writing skills
Book reviews are a double-edged blade. On a single side of this marketing sword, the strong positive reviews could help explode their novel to top of the book sales charts. However, on the other side of that sword is a well-defined blade that can slice deep into the author’s reputation and morale, mailing their novel to the basement in Amazon rankings. Purpose driven life

Type of Reviewers:

We have found there are two basic types of reviews. One type is generally objective. It’s based on the construction of the storyplot, assessment of the writer’s talent in developing character types and plot, theme, stream, dialogue, accuracy of details, completeness of the editing and enhancing. It is an purposeful critique showing how well the story was written. These reviewers will provide more details related to cause and effect. For example: “The viewpoint shifted quickly between three characters so that it is difficult to stick to the action. ” This type of review is generally provided by a professional who will be trained and experienced on paper. 

I’ve received tons of reviews, almost all of which are incredibly positive. Any valuable negative comments are from professional reviewers I well known. Their feedback provided observations how I will improve my writing. Consequently, I advantage from their expertise.

The second type of review is mostly subjective. The reviewer provides an analysis how they reacted to the story, how much they liked or failed to like the characters, plan, climax, and sometimes the ending. Their report is located mostly on their thoughts, rather than on the construction of the history. These reviewers may be someone who regularly reviews books for authors, or a customer who read the book and has no reviewer reporting experience.

Both review types provide a purpose. The purposeful review will point toward the author’s writing ability; the subjective will give attention to the reader’s enjoyment of the story. A history can be well written but may appeal to only certain sort of audience, or may be adored by a variety of people. Yet , a novel that is poorly constructed will likely neglect to impress any target audience, no matter the genre.

Let’s look at the regarding critics. An author will have to research to find the sort of reviewer that will suit his/her novel. Analysis will include looking for reviewers who focus on a particular genre. It is important to study the reviewer’s previous reviews to determine if their focus is on an author’s writing knowledge and skill, or if they give attention to how exciting the characters and plot are. Many acquire more requests for reviews than they are able to accept.

There is no standard how a review should be written. Reviewers are not purchased their assessment and published reviews. This reduces the opportunity of a person being paid to fabricate a positive review.

Anyone can to claim to be an authority how a novel should be built. Some reviewers have built a reputation if you are the ‘go to’ people for honest, unbiased, and professional reviews. Others are new to the industry, but show great enthusiasm to become the authority on what books you should consider buying.

One of many issues in being an source is that many times, if not almost all of the time, you do not arrive at choose who articles a subjective review of your book. Anyone who reads it can post a review, which is wonderful. The problem is that a subjective review can be misleading, and sometimes malicious.